The Future of Europe in the Context of Sino-American Competition
This special issue of Politique étrangère focuses on the proceedings of the Conference organized by the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri) for its 40th anniversary, held on April 10th, 2019, in Sorbonne University's Grand Amphithéâtre.
Resulting from deep changes brought to the Centre for Foreign Policy Studies, itself founded in 1935, Ifri emerged in an era we now consider as the beginning of the end of the old, Cold War world. In 1979, the Cold War was about to deal its final blow. While the Soviet Union was increasingly struggling to keep up with the US in the race for information technology, the downfall of the Gang of Four opened the way for economic development in China. 1979 was also shaped by revolution in Iran. The Islamic Republic rose from the ashes of the Pahlavi dynasty, marking the beginning of political Islam from a western perspective. At the time, in geopolitical circles however, (the word “geopolitics” was avoided because of its Nazi connotations) the expression “Third World” was still being used to designate underdeveloped countries. Its most ambitious representatives, such as India, Indonesia, and even Africa, dreamed of escaping the East-West bipolarity and endeavoured to achieve an ideology of non-alignment. In 1979, the European Economic Community (EEC) was still young, not even 25 years old. Great Britain had joined its ranks in an opportunistic move seven years previously, but the Community was still steered by the ideology of its founding states.
Forty years later, the international system has changed tremendously, even though the past has left its distinctive trace, as it always does. The system is once again tending towards bipolarity, without Russia this time, which has nonetheless managed to keep an important position on the international scene, particularly in Europe and the Middle East. The triumph of economic liberalism in the wake of the USSR's demise has radically altered development issues. The bond that kept the western ideology together is now crumbling before us, while the US has narrowed the scope of its national interest, a shift initiated before Donald Trump's election. Political Islam and terrorism have made their way into the spotlight. Since 2007, the scientist delusion that major economic crises were no longer possible has collapsed. The EEC, renamed European Union, sometimes seems to have lost its sense of origin and direction after all the shocks it has weathered, from economic ones to migratory ones to Brexit. The dizzying development of technology has kindled worry as much as hope, and millenarian fears are growing around climate change and other kinds of uncontrolled interdependency, like potential pandemics. Such was our world in 2019, the year Ifri celebrated its 40th anniversary. The came the COVID-19 pandemic.We shall see whether it becomes the wake-up call that will allow the European Union to find its way back to its fundamental purpose. [...]
(Extract from the Foreword, by par Thierry de Montbrial)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Future of Europe in the Context of Sino-American Competition, by Bruno Le Maire
The World of Yesterday and Tomorrow, by Thierry de Montbrial
What Can Europe Hope to Achieve in Tomorrow's World?, with Franziska Brantner, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Bernardino Leon, and Igor Yurgen
Europe and Africa, with Louise Mushikiwabo and Thierry de Montbrial
The Future of Europe from the US and Asian Point of View, with John Allen and Kishore Mahbubani
The Crucial Challenge of Cyberthreats, with Jean-Louis Gergorin and Thomas Gomart
The Future of Think Tanks, with Thomas Bagger, Thomas Gomart, Robin Niblett, and Daniela Schwarzer
Industry Response to Protectionnism, with Jean-Paul Agon and Patrick Pouyanné
New Global Challenges and European Security, with Julian King, Jean-Marie Guéhenno, Wolfgang Ischinger, Nathalie Tocci, and Hubert Védrine
Conclusions, by Jean-Yves Le Drian
This special issue is also available in French: "L'avenir de l'Europe face à la compétition sino-américaine".
Available in:
Themes and regions
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
The Future of Europe in the Context of Sino-American Competition
Find out more
Discover all our analysesThe Waning of Universalism
During the 19th century, Westerners provided ideological justifications for their colonization, namely spreading the Enlightenment across the globe. This project was received favorably until the second half of the 20th century. Over the last 20 years, it has met new hostility. The “universal values” promoted by the West are viewed today as a form of imperialism to be opposed – especially by China, Russia and Turkey.
The Future of the International Monetary and Financial System
Following the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, the international community sought new stability in the financial system and the assurance of sustained growth. The crisis that began in 2007-2008 has revealed weaknesses that affected advanced economies first and foremost. Efforts have since been made to consolidate the international financial architecture, to coordinate macroeconomic policy, and to improve foreign exchange relations, even if this latter objective has proven complex.
International trade disagreements: Beyond Trump
The trade war between the United States and China is not only due to Donald Trump’s impulsiveness. Its roots are in fact profound and follow three structural changes in the multilateral trading system: the reversal of comparative advantages, the now central role of certain developing countries, and the re-balancing of power that makes coordination between states difficult. In this context, the future of world trade has yet to be written.
Poverty and Inequality through 2030
Thanks to strong economic growth, poverty has tended to fall worldwide. But the trend is not sufficient to eradicate poverty by 2030. For this, growth would have to rise further and inequalities fall. Non-economic dimensions of well-being, such as education and health, also need to be taken into account. This assumes that governments in particular have the capacity to invest in public infrastructures.