Is the TEN-E Regulation Fit for a Decarbonized Future? A Battle to Shape the European Energy Transition
Briefings de l'Ifri, June 9, 2021
The European Union’s energy infrastructure policy has become obsolete with the adoption of both the Green Deal and the 2050 climate neutrality target. The ongoing review of the regulation on Trans-European Energy Networks (TEN-E) should lead to an-depth discussion on Europe’s energy transition strategy.
• The TEN-E regulation has streamlined the planning of European Union (EU) cross-border infrastructures and accelerated their development. It has been deeply rooted in a security of supply paradigm, at the expense of sustainability objectives.
• With the TEN-E revision proposal, the European Commission (EC) promotes its own vision of Europe’s future energy system and prioritizes efficient system integration and electrification for decarbonization.
• To overcome Europe’s divide on the role of gases, the TEN-E should opt for a case-by-case approach and require that all gas-related Projects of Common Interest (PCIs) be approved by the new European Scientific Advisory on Climate Change.
• Debates on gas should not overshadow what the TEN-E revision primarily aims to achieve: accelerating the electricity sector decarbonization by taking up the challenge of acceptability, financing the infrastructure investment gap and minimizing the costs for consumers.
Available in:
Regions and themes
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Is the TEN-E Regulation Fit for a Decarbonized Future? A Battle to Shape the European Energy Transition
Center for Energy & Climate
Ifri's Energy and Climate Center carries out activities and research on the geopolitical and geoeconomic issues of energy transitions such as energy security, competitiveness, control of value chains, and acceptability. Specialized in the study of European energy/climate policies as well as energy markets in Europe and around the world, its work also focuses on the energy and climate strategies of major powers such as the United States, China or India. It offers recognized expertise, enriched by international collaborations and events, particularly in Paris and Brussels.
Mining Nationalism and Export Restrictions: The Challenges of Economic Development
Since the end of the 2000s and especially the 2010s, resource nationalism has been on the rise.
Solar Radiation Management: A Climate Tool with Geopolitical Implications
The Paris Agreement (2015) aims to keep global warming below 2 °C, preferably 1.5 °C, above pre-industrial levels. Mitigation (reducing greenhouse gas emissions) remains the core tool for reaching net carbon neutrality by mid-century. However, a temperature overshoot is anticipated. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) forecasts that the 1.5 °C threshold will be exceeded in the coming years, with warming potentially peaking between 2.2 °C and 3.6 °C this century. Against this backdrop, three trends characterize the climate policy debate.
China’s Hydrogen Economy Five Years On
China’s hydrogen sector is not new. It is the world’s largest industrial hydrogen system, rooted in ammonia, methanol, refining, coal chemicals and by-product gas streams.
27 Plans for 2027: Turning the Electrification Action Plan into National Action
With the aim of structurally reducing the European economy’s dependence on fossil fuel imports and accelerating the energy transition, the European Commission has opted for electrification.