You are here

Observatory of Migration and Asylum


The changing context of asylum and migration in France must be considered in light of international mixed migration flows as well as European migration and integration policies. To address these issues, Ifri has created the Observatory of Migration and Asylum.

This 3-year programme aims to provide a space for debate to all actors involved in the field of migration and asylum in France and in Europe. The analysis of various actions carried out by public and private actors and civil society organisations is meant to reinforce possible synergies in order to meet the needs of refugees and migrants, promote innovative solutions, as well as undertake and disseminate research pertaining to asylum and migration.

Christophe BERTOSSI

Senior research fellow (PhD Habil.) and Director of the Center for Migration and Citizenship

Matthieu TARDIS

Research Fellow, Center for Migration and Citizenship


Since 2015, refugee resettlement programmes have grown significantly in Europe becoming a key component of European asylum strategy. In 2017, Emmanuel Macron committed to resettle in France 10,000 refugees until the end of 2019. Refugees from Syria and Africa are increasingly welcome in small...


The “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” was adopted in Marrakesh on 10 and 11 December 2018, after 18 months of consultation and negotiation. It is presented as the first United Nations’ agreement on a comprehensive approach to international migration in all its aspects....

By: Christophe BERTOSSI, Matthieu TARDIS, Patrick KLUGMAN, Georges DERTILIS, Catherine PERRON, Evelyne RIBERT, Philip RUDGE

Contrary to other immigration societies such as the United States, Canada or Australia, migrations is not a core element of European narratives on shared identity. Each country maintains a very particular understanding of his migratory past and on the extent to which it should become part of...


The articles collected in this special issue set out to assess critically both aspects (making and representing the world) of national models from a comparative perspective, bringing together analysis of immigration countries in Europe (in the Netherlands, France and Britain) and settler...


More often than not, the notion of a national model of immigrant integration is held to be self-evident in the comparative scholarship. This type of reasoning, however, does not go without serious costs for the social sciences. Among these costs are the danger of reifying the categories used...


The EU anti-discrimination agenda, as set out by the Amsterdam Treaty of 1997, has become a major issue for understanding the future of citizenship in Europe. This timely collection, which features internationally renowned contributors, including Andrew Geddes, Etienne Balibar, Stephen Castles...

Wednesday 07 November 2018
from 18:00 to 20:30 - Ifri Conferences

New waves of populism and identity politics have shaken Europe, in both the West and the East. They have made immigration, Islam and Muslims a source of tension and anxiety. These new discourses have not left the pact of citizenship unscathed. How could inclusive societies be established while...

Wednesday 25 January 2017
from 09:30 to 11:30 - Ifri Conferences

Local democracy is at the forefront of the challenges facing the EU today. In a context of growing socio-economic difficulties and attacks against the values of citizenship, what can local representatives do in order to support the participation and inclusion of all the citizens? ...

Thursday 15 December 2016
from 18:00 to 19:30 - Ifri Conferences

The arrival of one million refugees in Europe between 2015 and 2016 has been perceived as the proof of the drastic acceleration of international migration. What is the reality of the situation? How has this “refugee crisis” affected the European Union and its institutions? Where are we now,...

Monday 14 November 2016
from 09:30 to 17:30 - Ifri Conferences

The striking rise in the arrivals of refugees and migrants in 2015 shed light on many shortcomings in offering a shared vision of the right of asylum in Europe. If Europe has a longstanding and rich history of migration that has contributed to shape the continent, the memory of this history is...

Monday 25 April 2016
from 14:30 to 17:00

Europe has a longstanding history of migration that has contributed to shape the continent. However, memory of this history is hardly referred to in the debates concerning asylum and migration issues today.Europe has a longstanding history of migration that has contributed to shape the...

Friday 04 March 2016
from 14:00 to 18:00 - Ifri Conferences

Citizens’ participation seems to be challenged by a decade of severe economic and financial crisis while nationalistic and xenophobic divisions are tearing Europeans apart. On the other hand, innovations and new forms of civic participation seem also to emerge and the “refugee crisis” has...

No result

SUCCESS / Voicing Democracy in Successful European Societies

SUCCESS was a European network of citizens that live and work in disadvantaged neighbourhoods across four countries: Ballaro in Palermo (Italy), Ladywood in Birmingham (United-Kingdom), Morillon in Montreuil (France), and Outurela-Portela in Oeiras (Portugal). The project served as a laboratory for ideas on the future of citizenship in Europe, through a dynamic and original synthesis of the analysis of lived realities of the citizens, the practices of local institutions, and the European ideal.

See the video of the project

A European project initiated by the Ifri

The Centre for Migrations and Citizenship at Ifri launched the SUCCESS project in 2011, in collaboration with the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, the Padre Antonio Vieira Institute, and the University of Palermo, with the support of the “Europe for Citizens” Programme of the European Union and by the “Projets Citoyens” Programme of the Conseil régional d’Île-de-France.

Giving meaning to citizenship

SUCCESS brought together citizens from various countries and cultural, social and national backgrounds in order to go beyond the populist, racist and xenophobic sentiments concerning citizenship, social cohesion, integration of migrants, and multiculturalism in Europe today. The project went to the heart of local communities using a “bottom-up” approach that provided a voice to residents of these neighbourhoods who are rarely heard in the European debates on citizenship. Each local group brought together residents and professionals (including health care and education professionals, and police officers) who worked within the neighbourhood. The groups met frequently.

The participants met each year for three days of workshops in one of the four cities of the project: Lisbon in 2012, Palermo in 2013, Birmingham in 2014, and Montreuil in 2015. It was an occasion for them to share the results of their discussions and the projects they developed locally. It was an occasion to reflect, to meet different personalities, and to share festive moments that provide substance and meaning to their conception of citizenship. The participants identified 14 themes in order to structure their thinking on the future of citizenship in Europe.


How can we bring institutions and citizens closer together? In disadvantaged neighbourhoods, this relationship is perceived as being difficult, if it exists at all. Many prejudices exist in the interactions between citizens and the police, the school system, and more generally public services and local authorities. These are reinforced by practices which are seen by the population as lacking legitimacy, like “stop-and-search”. As the SUCCESS groups analysed this issue within their respective countries, they made recommendations on ways to enhance citizens’ trust in their institutions. This includes, for example, possible incentives for institutions to provide better information and greater transparency on their functioning, and to create or strengthen mediation practices and bodies.

“What changes will the police forces make to convince young people that they can go and seek help from the police and get it?” Alex, Ladywood, Birmingham, UK


What does it mean to be part of Europe? The issue of a common European citizenship is often associated with the absence of one single European identity. However, it is the plurality of feelings of belonging that makes Europe so unique, encompassing local, regional, national, cultural, linguistic, and religious identities, and various traditions and histories, including immigrants’ ones. The SUCCESS groups placed these diverse but shared legacies at the heart of their reflection on being young citizens. They described Europe as made up of all these feelings of belonging nourrishing their commitment as active citizens, far beyond the traditional frameworks usually associated with the nation-state or exclusive identities.

“When I’m involved in local projects, I feel like a Ladywood citizen. When we have national celebrations, I feel like a UK citizen. Learning different languages allows me to feel a part of Europe. When I visit my family back in India I feel like a world citizen.” Manraj, Ladywood, Birmingham, United Kingdom


How can we create a direct dialogue among Europeans? The SUCCESS groups worked together to develop new methods to enable dialogue between citizens of different countries who live diverse national and local realities but who still face many common issues; namely, social exclusion, economic inequality, discrimination, various forms of racism and xenophobia, populism etc. By comparing the contexts, historical traditions and institutions of the four countries/cities/neighbourhoods in question, the SUCCESS groups developed a bottom-up analysis, based in the local experiences of citizens, of the challenges of performing citizenship at the local, national and European levels.

“Learning about issues in disadvantaged immigrant neighbourhoods all around Europe, and how they deal with issues, will help us find new ways to deal with our own issues.” Helder, Outurela-Portela, Oeiras, Portugal


What education for citizenship? This question does not limit itself to civic education. The SUCCESS groups focused their thinking on the interplay between education and social mobility, employment, inclusion, access to rights and the fight against various forms of prejudices. More education results in greater inclusion and life chances. It also helps eliminate negative attitudes towards immigrants and ethnic minorities and fight against all forms of discrimination. Education is also a vehicle for transmitting memories, be they local or national, from “here” or a legacy of immigration.

“School is the first instrument to improve integration in a country. To that end, school teachers need to be trained to work in a context where language and culture might be seen as an obstacle.” Giacomo, Ballarò, Palermo, Italia


How can citizens think about equality in societies that produce discrimination and exclusion? One answer lies in the fight against discrimination, already at the heart of the European project. The issue also concerns inequality between neighbourhoods in the same city or among different cities. The complex issues surrounding inequality make the very project of equality-based societies a complex, multileveled question involving equal rights as much as equal opportunities, as well as social, institutional and territorial logics. The SUCCESS groups reflected on possible methods to bind together the cultural, social, economic and territorial dimensions of equality and of promoting this approach through European policies.

“When you are in Morillon, you are in Morillon, and you have the impression that things are happening around you, but you can’t access them.” Omar, Le Morillon, Montreuil, France


Can Europe enhance young people’s active citizenship in disadvantaged neighbourhoods? Public debates in Europe reflect increasing nationalist, populist, xenophobic and racist sentiments that both stigmatize immigration and multicultural neighbourhoods in European cities, and reject Europe as a political and cultural project of a common citizenship. To address these debates, the SUCCESS groups questioned how EU institutions can encourage the local and national participation of citizens living in multicultural neighbourhoods. Through this pragmatic perspective, they placed Europe at the heart of their definition of citizenship.

“If we see that Europe is consulting people in the community about the future of citizenship, if we feel that our opinion matters and that we can make a difference, then people will start to reflect upon these questions and give their opinion.” Amilcar, Outurela-Portela, Oeiras, Portugal


How can we think about diversity also in terms of gender and sexuality? To varying degrees, discrimination and the moral boundaries that fragment European societies contradict the principle of equal rights. These relate not only to exclusion due to racism, Islamophobia and the rejection of immigrants but also to sexism and homophobia. The SUCCESS groups analysed the relationships that exist between different types of exclusion and place particular emphasis upon the role of women, and especially immigrant women, in creating social ties within their neighbourhoods. The groups also underlined the importance of fighting against all forms of discrimination based upon gender and sexual orientation.

“Whether they are Romanian or Nigerian, it’s often the women who open their doors, take interest in social life, at what is going to happen, what is going to change and how, and not only to our role in society but also to the cultural and human evolutions.” Giuppa, Ballarò, Palermo, Italia


How can we guarantee the right to healthcare for the most vulnerable populations? Some voices today call for a restriction of foreigners’ access to medical care, as a way of fighting “unwanted” immigration. This anti-immigrant rhetoric masks the actual problem of adapting healthcare institutions in order to respond to the most vulnerable sections of European immigration societies. Based on the daily realities of their neighbourhoods, the SUCCESS groups weighed up the costs, for citizenship, of such large gaps in access to care among the different communities. Their reflection focused on solutions such as professional training and improved ways to reach out to and accommodate immigrants.

“At the international level, the right to health must be recognized as a fundamental right for  people, which creates the possibility for their active participation as citizens and their contribution to the development of our society.” Ana, Outurela-Portela, Oeiras, Portugal


How can we make citizenship a concrete practice? Citizenship is not a question for cultural or economic elites only, nor is it an abstract and theoretical idea. It is above all a practice. The local level represents a concrete space for such a practice, where citizens can address the important question of living together through a shared reality and lived experience. Democratic participation at the local level provides a laboratory for innovation, questioning, and dialogue between institutions and populations at the local level. The SUCCESS groups thought of their neighbourhoods as a reference point for the concrete practice of citizenship which can then inform and improve the actions of national and EU institutions.

“My neighbourhood is the most important place for me because it’s where I’ve lived all my life. My work is going to be more global now but Outurela-Portela will always be an example. You’re always working for a community, no matter how big it is.” Helder, Outurela-Portela, Oeiras, Portugal


How can we reverse the negative stereotypes of certain neighbourhoods? Public debate in Europe has established a link between immigration, delinquency, and insecurity, which stigmatizes disadvantaged neighbourhoods and their residents. Notions like “banlieue,” “youth” and “Muslims” mask realities that are very different from the rhetoric put forth but are difficult to transmit to the public. In their analysis, the SUCCESS groups thought about how they could work directly with the media, by providingtraining for journalists on this subject, for example, to promote alternative perceptions and deconstruct received ideas and their negative consequences on the notion of “common belonging”.

“The Office of Budget Responsibility notes that immigrants make a positive contribution to UK finances. However, public perception of immigrants ‘overburdening’ the welfare system is based, not on the figures, but on inaccurate media and stereotypical portrayals.” Amy, Ladywood, Birmingham, United Kingdom


How can we reconcile Europeans with multiculturalism? Since the early 2000s, the “crisis of multiculturalism” has been at the centre of debates in Europe. Those who condemn multiculturalism claim it has led to a “failure of immigrant integration.” Such claims are mostly based on misconceptions and/or electoral considerations and do not stand up to scrutiny. Moreover, cultural diversity in Europe is not a question of opinion or preference. It is already a reality, lived by Europeans. The SUCCESS groups thought about how they could break down the fears and prejudices promoted by dominant public discourses and search for ways to present multiculturalism as a standard dimension of citizenship.

“We must take multiculturalism into account, because it exists. It’s here every day. We say ‘hello’ and ‘goodbye.’ We may or may not like it, but it is here.” Fouzya, Le Morillon, Montreuil, France


How can we convince citizens of the importance of participation within institutions? Citizenship cannot exist if citizens to do not have an active relationship with their political and civic institutions, especially at the local level. Elections, neighbourhood councils and consultations, parent-teacher meetings etc.: all serve as important forms of citizen participation. Such participation reinforces the capacity of citizens to be recognised as full participants in the transparent and democratic functioning of institutions. The SUCCESS groups worked together to find ways to convince their neighbourhood residents of the significance of such participation. In this way, they tried to have an impact on relevant policies and to strengthen the sense of being fully-fledged citizens at the local, national and European levels.

“We the youngsters could, from the ground, break the barriers. If we don’t do it, there won’t be a future.” Aroua, Ballarò, Palermo, Italia


How can citizens be better represented? A central problem of citizenship has to do with citizens’ lack of trust in national and European institutions which are often perceived as far removed from the reality of their daily lives. The under-representation of women, young people and people of ethnic minorities in certain institutions contributes to this perceived distance. By comparing situations that vary from one country to another, the SUCCESS groups analysed the factors that could promote better representation of these minorities.

“Institutions must look and sound like the people it represents and embrace their diversity. Democracy is about that: not being excluded but being part of it, regardless of one’s age, gender, ethnicity and social status.” Tyrone, Ladywood, Birmingham, Grande-Bretagne


How can we promote citizenship in a period of economic crisis? A lack of perspective coupled with the economic crisis represents a significant obstacle to citizen participation. This is especially true in neighbourhoods where the unemployment level is two or three times higher than the national average and where young people, women and minority and immigrant populations are disproportionately affected. Therefore, to understand citizenship today it is also necessary to consider the socio-economic dimensions of the issue and the importance of the welfare state in the age of globalization. The reflection of the SUCCESS groups focused on the importance of understanding these issues in Europe today.

“We continue to place people back to back, creating fear with the image of the “Polish plumber” or of Greece. I think that it is necessary to create economic harmonization for the situation to improve, and to highlight our common experiences and viewpoints on the issues.” Aurélie, Le Morillon, Montreuil, France