A Transatlantic Defense Industrial Base? Two Contrasting Views
The evolving landscape of global defense cooperation has brought the transatlantic relationship between the United States (US) and Europe into sharp focus. As geopolitical tensions rise and the threat environment becomes more complex, the question of how Europe can best ensure its security while navigating its relationship with the United States has become paramount. This double feature report offers two contrasting views on the dynamics of US-Europe defense industrial relations, highlighting the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for both parties.
The evolving landscape of global defense cooperation has brought the transatlantic relationship between the United States (US) and Europe into sharp focus. As geopolitical tensions rise and the threat environment becomes more complex, the question of how Europe can best ensure its security while navigating its relationship with the United States has become paramount. This double feature report offers two contrasting views on the dynamics of US-Europe defense industrial relations, highlighting the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for both parties.
The first text, authored by Jonathan Caverley and Ethan Kapstein, presents a perspective that underscores the limitations of European strategic autonomy in defense. They argue that despite increased defense spending and initiatives like the Draghi Report, Europe remains heavily reliant on the United States for advanced military technology and industrial capabilities. They suggest that Europe should accept a junior partner status within the transatlantic alliance, leveraging US technological superiority to bolster its own defense capabilities. This approach, they contend, would allow Europe to benefit from the most advanced defense systems while acknowledging the economic and industrial realities that constrain its ability to achieve full autonomy.
In the second text, Élie Tenenbaum and Léo Péria-Peigné challenge the overly pessimistic narratives surrounding the European defense industry. They highlight the successes and technological advancements of European defense firms, arguing that Europe has the potential to be a significant player in the global defense market. Tenenbaum and Péria-Peigné question the reliability of US defense supplies, citing concerns over production delays, operational limitations, and stringent export controls. They advocate for a more balanced transatlantic partnership, where Europe can assert its industrial capabilities and strategic autonomy while still cooperating with the United States.
Together, these two texts, respectively written by American and European researchers, weigh on an increasingly heightened debate surrounding transatlantic defense cooperation. They explore the tensions between the need for European strategic autonomy and the benefits of leveraging US technological and industrial strengths. As Europe grapples with the challenges of ensuring its security in an increasingly uncertain world, these perspectives offer valuable insights into the future of defense industrial relations between the United States and Europe.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
A Transatlantic Defense Industrial Base? Two Contrasting Views
Confronting Russia’s High-Velocity Arsenal: European Challenges and Solutions
Since February 2022, Russian missile and long-range drone strikes against Ukraine have served as near-daily reminders of what European states could face in a war with Russia. The same weapon systems battering Ukrainian infrastructure and population centers would be directed against European military and civilian targets in any confrontation between Russia and NATO. As Russian missile production expands and its arsenal diversifies, Europe must confront an uncomfortable question: how to deter, and if push comes to shove, fight Russia's long-range strike arsenal?
The War on Terrorism: Global Experts Reflect on Lessons Learned Twenty-Five Years After 9/11
Twenty-five years ago, the September 11 attacks prompted the invention of new security architectures that shaped the war on terrorism. Sixteen think tank experts from fifteen countries reflect on the successes, failures, and missed opportunities in the fight against terrorism—a fight that is still ongoing.
From Corsairs to Private Military Contractors. Nonmilitary Maritime Actors and the Historical Continuities of Naval Warfare
Since late 2023, several Houthi attacks on commercial shipping have involved privately contracted armed teams conducting defensive engagements and coordinating immediate response efforts, often in the relative absence of regular naval forces during the immediate hostilities at sea. These cases highlight a strategic tension that increasingly confronts modern navies. On the one hand, they are expected to conduct persistent, low-intensity maritime security tasks such as counterpiracy, maritime policing, and the protection of commercial shipping. On the other hand, they face renewed pressure to prepare for high-intensity conflict against peer and near-peer adversaries amid the return of great power competition.
Framework Nation: A European Challenge and French Ambition
First appearing in the early 2000s, the framework nation concept follows several distinct rationales, whether it refers to a country assuming the leadership of a military operation, directing a multinational capability project, or commanding a permanent force structure. In every case, the country that takes on this role fully intends to derive from it additional politico-military influence.