A Transatlantic Defense Industrial Base? Two Contrasting Views
The evolving landscape of global defense cooperation has brought the transatlantic relationship between the United States (US) and Europe into sharp focus. As geopolitical tensions rise and the threat environment becomes more complex, the question of how Europe can best ensure its security while navigating its relationship with the United States has become paramount. This double feature report offers two contrasting views on the dynamics of US-Europe defense industrial relations, highlighting the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for both parties.
The evolving landscape of global defense cooperation has brought the transatlantic relationship between the United States (US) and Europe into sharp focus. As geopolitical tensions rise and the threat environment becomes more complex, the question of how Europe can best ensure its security while navigating its relationship with the United States has become paramount. This double feature report offers two contrasting views on the dynamics of US-Europe defense industrial relations, highlighting the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for both parties.
The first text, authored by Jonathan Caverley and Ethan Kapstein, presents a perspective that underscores the limitations of European strategic autonomy in defense. They argue that despite increased defense spending and initiatives like the Draghi Report, Europe remains heavily reliant on the United States for advanced military technology and industrial capabilities. They suggest that Europe should accept a junior partner status within the transatlantic alliance, leveraging US technological superiority to bolster its own defense capabilities. This approach, they contend, would allow Europe to benefit from the most advanced defense systems while acknowledging the economic and industrial realities that constrain its ability to achieve full autonomy.
In the second text, Élie Tenenbaum and Léo Péria-Peigné challenge the overly pessimistic narratives surrounding the European defense industry. They highlight the successes and technological advancements of European defense firms, arguing that Europe has the potential to be a significant player in the global defense market. Tenenbaum and Péria-Peigné question the reliability of US defense supplies, citing concerns over production delays, operational limitations, and stringent export controls. They advocate for a more balanced transatlantic partnership, where Europe can assert its industrial capabilities and strategic autonomy while still cooperating with the United States.
Together, these two texts, respectively written by American and European researchers, weigh on an increasingly heightened debate surrounding transatlantic defense cooperation. They explore the tensions between the need for European strategic autonomy and the benefits of leveraging US technological and industrial strengths. As Europe grapples with the challenges of ensuring its security in an increasingly uncertain world, these perspectives offer valuable insights into the future of defense industrial relations between the United States and Europe.
Available in:
Themes and regions
ISBN / ISSN
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
A Transatlantic Defense Industrial Base? Two Contrasting Views
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesFury from the Skies. A Strategic Analysis of Air Campaign against Iran
What is the outcome of Operations Roaring Lion (RL) and Epic Fury (EF), launched by Israel and the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28, 2026?
Finland: The Ally Who Came in from the Cold
Among all European countries, Finland is perhaps the one whose strategic culture and military model have changed the least since the end of the Cold War. Built after the end of the Second World War to deter a potential new Soviet invasion, this model enabled Finland to serve as an example of European rearmament.
Stability under Pressure. A Pakistani View on Nuclear Deterrence after Pahalgam
The May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis after the Pahalgam attack has generated a familiar but incomplete debate: did nuclear deterrence work, or did it merely allow both sides to fight a limited war under the nuclear shadow? The better answer is that deterrence worked at the level at which it was designed to work. It prevented a general war and an uncontrolled vertical escalation, and kept nuclear weapons in the background. But it did not prevent India from attempting to carve out space for conventional action, nor did it prevent Pakistan from responding conventionally to restore deterrence credibility.